• POLO v. POLO REALE: A Closer Look at the EU Trademark Opposition

    POLO v. POLO REALE: A Closer Look at the EU Trademark Opposition

    On April 7, 2025, the Opposition Division of the European Union Intellectual Property Office delivered a significant ruling in a dispute between The Polo/Lauren Company L.P., the renowned American luxury brand, and Prime Cotton FZ-LCC from the UAE. The opposition concerned trademark application No 18 979 833 for the ‘POLO REALE’ figurative mark. This ruling…

    Read more….


  • Lost International v. Lady Gaga: A Trademark Infringement Dispute over “Mayhem”

    Lost International v. Lady Gaga: A Trademark Infringement Dispute over “Mayhem”

    The case of Lost International v. Lady Gaga, pending before the United States District Court for the Central District of California, centres on allegations of trademark infringement involving the use of the mark “Mayhem.” The plaintiff, a long-established surf and lifestyle brand, asserts that Lady Gaga’s commercial use of the word “Mayhem” in connection with…

    Read more….


  • Lux Juris Internship Opportunity

    Lux Juris Internship Opportunity

    We are looking for students from anywhere in the world who want to explore the legal side of fashion and luxury. This is a virtual internship for those ready to go deep into fashion law, with a clear focus on intellectual property. You will be involved in assisting with legal research, supporting the editor, and…

    Read more….


  • Dior’s Victory: EUIPO Rejects CRISPY DYOR Following Opposition

    Dior’s Victory: EUIPO Rejects CRISPY DYOR Following Opposition

    On 25 March 2025, the EUIPO confirmed Christian Dior Couture’s challenge by rejecting the application for CRISPY DYOR in its entirety. The decision was based solely on the similarities between the contested word mark and Dior’s established figurative mark, rather than on any reputation-based arguments. The contested sign covered jewellery and clothing, which were found…

    Read more….


  • Supreme Wins EUIPO Opposition Against ‘Supins’ Mark

    Supreme Wins EUIPO Opposition Against ‘Supins’ Mark

    Supreme has succeeded in a recent trademark opposition before the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), securing a full rejection of a rival application that bore similarities to its well-known branding. On 8 April 2025, the EUIPO’s Opposition Division ruled in favour of Chapter 4 Corp., the owner of the Supreme brand, in a case…

    Read more….


  • Chanel’s “N° 5” v M5: How Close Is Too Close?

    Chanel’s “N° 5” v M5: How Close Is Too Close?

    In a decision issued on 20 March 2025 by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), a dispute between Chanel and the Slovenian company Simb d.o.o., over its “m5” trademark, highlighted the fine line between brand identity and imitation in the beauty industry. The case focused on a figurative trademark applied for by Simb d.o.o.,…

    Read more….


  • Mercedes-Benz Off-Road Logo Fails Trade Mark Test in EUIPO

    Mercedes-Benz Off-Road Logo Fails Trade Mark Test in EUIPO

    On 19 March 2025, the General Court of the European Union ruled in Case T-400/24, rejecting Mercedes-Benz Group AG’s application to register a figurative trade mark representing an ascending off-road vehicle. The decision, based on Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, confirmed that the mark lacked distinctive character and could not be registered. Background to…

    Read more….


  • Patagonia Takes Legal Action Against Marden’s Over Counterfeit Goods

    Patagonia Takes Legal Action Against Marden’s Over Counterfeit Goods

    Patagonia Inc. filed a lawsuit on March 18, 2025, against Marden’s, a discount retail chain in Maine, alleging trademark counterfeiting, trademark infringement, unfair competition, dilution, and copyright infringement. The complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Maine, claims that Marden’s has been selling counterfeit Patagonia-branded jackets featuring unauthorised reproductions of…

    Read more….


  • Richemont Fails to Prove Parasitism as Court Sides with Louis Vuitton

    Richemont Fails to Prove Parasitism as Court Sides with Louis Vuitton

    On March 5, 2025, the French Court of Cassation ruled in favour of Louis Vuitton, dismissing an appeal brought by Richemont, the owner of Van Cleef & Arpels. The dispute centered on allegations that Vuitton’s Color Blossom jewellery collection unfairly imitated Van Cleef & Arpels’ renowned Alhambra design. The court upheld previous rulings that Vuitton’s…

    Read more….