Articles
-
Beverly Hills Polo Club vs. Amazon: Court Orders Nearly $39M in Damages

The High Court of Delhi has ruled in Lifestyle Equities CV & Anr. vs Amazon Technologies, Inc., exposing how e-commerce giants leverage marketplace dominance at the expense of brand owners. Amazon was found to have used a logo infringing upon the Beverly Hills Polo Club (BHPC) trademark, leading to a permanent injunction and substantial damages.
-
Louis Vuitton v. Warner Bros.: Trademark Protection vs. Creative Expression

On December 22, 2011, Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. filed a lawsuit against Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. following the release of The Hangover: Part II. The dispute centered around the use of a travel bag in the film, which Louis Vuitton argued was a counterfeit version of its signature Toile Monogram design. The bag, produced by
-
Birkenstock’s sandal designs failed to qualify for copyright

A design may be instantly recognisable, commercially successful, and deeply associated with a brand, but that does not mean it qualifies for copyright protection. The German Federal Court of Justice has ruled that Birkenstock’s Madrid and Arizona sandal designs do not qualify for copyright protection. The decision confirms that these widely recognised footwear models lack
-
Logo Dispute: Christian Dior and Twinset S.p.A. Go Head-to-Head Over Trademark Rights

A recent trademark dispute has highlighted the complexities of branding in the fashion industry, focusing on the competition between two notable brands: Twinset S.p.A. and Christian Dior Couture. The case originated in April 2022 when Twinset sought to register a new figurative trademark covering a variety of products, in the European Union. The Opposition Shortly
-
BurberryBeauty.com Case: A Timeless Lesson in Brand Protection

Burberry, renowned for its iconic trench coats and signature check pattern, successfully reclaimed the domain burberrybeauty.com through a UDRP proceeding. This outcome at the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Centre shows Burberry’s commitment to safeguarding its trademark and maintaining its brand identity in the digital space. This case shows Burberry’s strategy of protecting its trademark rights
-
Charlotte Tilbury vs Aldi: Copyright Dispute Over Beauty Palette

Charlotte Tilbury, known for its luxury makeup and skincare, has secured a decisive legal victory in the Charlotte Tilbury vs Aldi case. The brand, recognised for its premium products and distinctive aesthetic, brought proceedings against Aldi for copyright infringement. The dispute centred on Aldi’s imitation of Charlotte Tilbury’s iconic Filmstar Bronze and Glow palette. The
-
Dunhill Prevails in Trademark Dispute Against Danhuoli in China

Dunhill has secured a decisive ruling in China against Danhuoli, a company found guilty of trademark infringement and unfair competition. The Foshan Intermediate People’s Court ordered Danhuoli to pay RMB 10 million (approximately $1.47 million USD) in damages. The ruling is a strong signal that China’s intellectual property enforcement is tightening, particularly for foreign luxury
-
The Ritz-Carlton Fined $535,000 for Hazardous Waste Violations in California

Environmental regulations have long been non-negotiable, and luxury hotel brands are no exception. In 2022, The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, renowned for its high-end accommodations, faced a $535,000 civil penalty for mishandling hazardous waste across its eight California properties, including its Rancho Mirage location in Riverside County. Court Judgment Highlights Mismanagement A judgment issued by the
-
Ferrari vs. Philipp Plein: The Price of Trademark Missteps

Ferrari has made its position unmistakable, its trademarks are not open to reinterpretation. A dispute involving Philipp Plein’s unauthorised use of Ferrari’s trademarks has led to significant penalties, drawing attention from the fashion and automotive industries. Rulings by Italian courts highlight the serious consequences of misusing trademarks, particularly those tied to luxury brands. The Instagram
-
Piaget’s Timely Action: Securing the Brand One Domain at a Time

Piaget, the Swiss luxury brand renowned for its high-end watches and jewellery, faced a domain name dispute involving the protection of its trademark. The conflict centered on two domain names, piagetwatch(dot)com and piagetwatches(dot)com, which were deemed confusingly similar to the Piaget trademark. The Complaint Richemont, the Swiss luxury group behind Piaget, alleged that the domain