Articles
-
Adidas vs Fashion Nova: The Fight Over Stripes Returns to Court
Adidas vs Fashion Nova has resurfaced as Adidas files a new lawsuit alleging that Fashion Nova violated the terms of a 2022 settlement agreement concerning its Three Stripe trademark. The complaint, filed on March 4, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, includes claims of trademark infringement, breach of contract,…
-
Hermès’ “H” in Question: The Legal Standard for Genuine Use
Hermès International, known for its luxury goods, sought to protect its figurative trademark through an International Registration designating the EU. This trademark covers a range of items in Class 25, including clothing, footwear, and accessories. The application was made on September 8, 2016, but the situation turned into a legal tug-of-war when Markus Bennemann filed…
-
Beverly Hills Polo Club vs. Amazon: Court Orders Nearly $39M in Damages
The High Court of Delhi has ruled in Lifestyle Equities CV & Anr. vs Amazon Technologies, Inc., exposing how e-commerce giants leverage marketplace dominance at the expense of brand owners. Amazon was found to have used a logo infringing upon the Beverly Hills Polo Club (BHPC) trademark, leading to a permanent injunction and substantial damages.…
-
Louis Vuitton v. Warner Bros.: Trademark Protection vs. Creative Expression
On December 22, 2011, Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. filed a lawsuit against Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. following the release of The Hangover: Part II. The dispute centered around the use of a travel bag in the film, which Louis Vuitton argued was a counterfeit version of its signature Toile Monogram design. The bag, produced by…
-
Birkenstock’s sandal designs failed to qualify for copyright
A design may be instantly recognisable, commercially successful, and deeply associated with a brand, but that does not mean it qualifies for copyright protection. The German Federal Court of Justice has ruled that Birkenstock’s Madrid and Arizona sandal designs do not qualify for copyright protection. The decision confirms that these widely recognised footwear models lack…
-
Logo Dispute: Christian Dior and Twinset S.p.A. Go Head-to-Head Over Trademark Rights
A recent trademark dispute has highlighted the complexities of branding in the fashion industry, focusing on the competition between two notable brands: Twinset S.p.A. and Christian Dior Couture. The case originated in April 2022 when Twinset sought to register a new figurative trademark covering a variety of products, in the European Union. The Opposition Shortly…
-
BurberryBeauty.com Case: A Timeless Lesson in Brand Protection
Burberry, renowned for its iconic trench coats and signature check pattern, successfully reclaimed the domain burberrybeauty.com through a UDRP proceeding. This outcome at the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Centre shows Burberry’s commitment to safeguarding its trademark and maintaining its brand identity in the digital space. This case shows Burberry’s strategy of protecting its trademark rights…
-
Charlotte Tilbury vs Aldi: Copyright Dispute Over Beauty Palette
Charlotte Tilbury, known for its luxury makeup and skincare, has secured a decisive legal victory in the Charlotte Tilbury vs Aldi case. The brand, recognised for its premium products and distinctive aesthetic, brought proceedings against Aldi for copyright infringement. The dispute centred on Aldi’s imitation of Charlotte Tilbury’s iconic Filmstar Bronze and Glow palette. The…
-
Dunhill Prevails in Trademark Dispute Against Danhuoli in China
Dunhill has secured a decisive ruling in China against Danhuoli, a company found guilty of trademark infringement and unfair competition. The Foshan Intermediate People’s Court ordered Danhuoli to pay RMB 10 million (approximately $1.47 million USD) in damages. The ruling is a strong signal that China’s intellectual property enforcement is tightening, particularly for foreign luxury…
-
The Ritz-Carlton Fined $535,000 for Hazardous Waste Violations in California
Environmental regulations have long been non-negotiable, and luxury hotel brands are no exception. In 2022, The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, renowned for its high-end accommodations, faced a $535,000 civil penalty for mishandling hazardous waste across its eight California properties, including its Rancho Mirage location in Riverside County. Court Judgment Highlights Mismanagement A judgment issued by the…