The Spotlight section on Lux Juris offers quick updates and key insights into the latest developments in fashion and luxury law. Stay informed with concise, relevant information.
-
New York Fashion Workers Act: A New Era of Accountability
“As someone that’s been in this industry since a teenager, watching the Act take shape has been incredibly meaningful. I have been a victim of mistreatment and the pressure to accept things that shouldn’t be normal. This Act feels like a turning point. We matter. Our bodies are not for sale, and we deserve to
-
Stronger ‘OFF’: Off-White Stops OFFPLAN
Decision date: 11 July 2025 In the fashion sector, a single word such as “OFF” can be sufficient to block another mark if the new sign covers the same or closely related product classes. The risk of rejection is high because the likelihood of confusion for fashion and accessories remains significant. Minor changes to a
-
Louis Vuitton Counterfeit Case: Singapore Court Decision
On 2 July 2025, the High Court of Singapore in Louis Vuitton Malletier vs Ng Hoe Seng ruled on statutory damages for selling goods online that carried counterfeit versions of a luxury brand’s trade marks. Ng Hoe Seng, the person behind EMCASE SG, ran an Instagram store called emcase_sg which offered items described as “upcycled”
-
Lululemon vs Costco: Lawsuit Alleges Copycat Apparel and Trade Mark Infringement
Lululemon vs Costco Dispute Filed in California On 27 June 2025, Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. and Lululemon USA Inc. filed a lawsuit against Costco Wholesale Corporation in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The claim alleges that Costco has imported, marketed and sold garments that imitate the protected design features,
-
Why Cultural Identity Is Taken Without Consent in Fashion
Why Fashion Law Struggles to Address Cultural Appropriation When a global fashion house unveils a design on the runway, few inside the industry stop to ask where it came from, who first shaped it, or whether permission ever figured in its making. Some forms are celebrated as fresh creative work, while others are quietly lifted,
-
SUPREME Trademark Dispute: ‘Supredog’ Mark Cancelled by EUIPO
On 11 June 2025, the European Union Intellectual Property Office cancelled the word mark ‘Supredog’ following an invalidity application by Chapter 4 Corp., the company behind SUPREME. The Cancellation Division found that the contested mark was too closely aligned with the earlier SUPREME figurative mark and that its continued use would unfairly benefit from the
-
Levi Strauss v. Gear Up International: Use of similar curved line could mislead consumers and exploit Levi’s reputation.
On 29 April 2025, the EUIPO issued its decision in Levi Strauss & Co v. Gear Up International Ltd, partially upholding Levi Strauss’s opposition to a figurative trade mark application filed by Gear Up. The contested sign, consisting of two curved lines converging at a pointed centre, was found to create a mental association with
-
Supreme Wins EUIPO Opposition Against ‘Supins’ Mark
Supreme has succeeded in a recent trademark opposition before the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), securing a full rejection of a rival application that bore similarities to its well-known branding. On 8 April 2025, the EUIPO’s Opposition Division ruled in favour of Chapter 4 Corp., the owner of the Supreme brand, in a case
-
Patagonia Takes Legal Action Against Marden’s Over Counterfeit Goods
Patagonia Inc. filed a lawsuit on March 18, 2025, against Marden’s, a discount retail chain in Maine, alleging trademark counterfeiting, trademark infringement, unfair competition, dilution, and copyright infringement. The complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Maine, claims that Marden’s has been selling counterfeit Patagonia-branded jackets featuring unauthorised reproductions of
-
Beverly Hills Polo Club vs. Amazon: Court Orders Nearly $39M in Damages
The High Court of Delhi has ruled in Lifestyle Equities CV & Anr. vs Amazon Technologies, Inc., exposing how e-commerce giants leverage marketplace dominance at the expense of brand owners. Amazon was found to have used a logo infringing upon the Beverly Hills Polo Club (BHPC) trademark, leading to a permanent injunction and substantial damages.