Timberland’s Yellow Boot has been recognised as a protectable trademark in Brazil following a ruling by the 13th Federal Court of Rio de Janeiro. The decision overturned the earlier refusal by the Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office (BPTO) and confirmed that the boot’s design features meet the legal requirements for trademark protection. The case illustrates how non-traditional marks can obtain recognition through acquired distinctiveness and provides practical guidance for brands seeking to protect distinctive design elements.
The Yellow Boot and Its Market Presence
Introduced in 1973, the Yellow Boot quickly became Timberland’s most recognisable product. It entered the Brazilian market in 1996 and has been continuously available ever since. Over decades of consistent presence, the boot has become closely associated with the Timberland brand in the minds of consumers.
Despite this long-standing market presence, Timberland’s initial application to register the boot’s three-dimensional design features as a trademark was refused by the BPTO.
Administrative Refusal and Its Basis
BPTO’s refusal was based on the finding that the boot shared similarities with other footwear on the market, which in the Office’s view prevented it from being individually identified as originating from Timberland. The Office concluded that the boot’s form and aesthetic elements did not demonstrate inherent distinctiveness on their own.
This approach reflects BPTO’s strict treatment of three-dimensional marks, under which inherent distinctiveness is rarely acknowledged unless the design departs significantly from functional or expected characteristics.
Timberland’s Appeal and Evidence of Acquired Distinctiveness
Timberland appealed the refusal, arguing that the Yellow Boot had acquired distinctiveness in Brazil. The company submitted evidence of long-term commercial use, consistent product presentation, and sustained consumer recognition. The argument emphasised that consumers no longer saw the boot as a generic work boot but rather as a product unmistakably associated with Timberland, even without word marks.
This approach highlights that distinctiveness can develop over time through sustained use, rather than relying solely on inherent design features.
Court Assessment
The Court accepted Timberland’s arguments and ordered registration of the design features. In evaluating the boot, the Court considered its overall visual impression rather than isolating individual elements. The recognisability of the Yellow Boot arises from the interplay of multiple features: signature yellow colouring, padded collar, two-tone outsole and laces, prominent stitching, hexagonal eyelets, and distinctive silhouette.
Together, these elements create a commercial identity that consumers associate with Timberland. The Court concluded that this combination establishes a clear visual identity, and long-term, widespread use satisfies the legal threshold for acquired distinctiveness, supporting registration.
Limits of Protection
The ruling clarifies that protection applies to the design features in their entirety, not to isolated elements. Competitors remain free to produce functional work boots or use similar individual features. What is prohibited is reproducing the specific combination of design elements in a manner likely to cause confusion or suggest affiliation with Timberland.
What Brands Should Know
The Timberland decision provides practical guidance for brands seeking protection for non-traditional marks in Brazil. It confirms that design features can be registered when consumers recognise them as indicating the brand’s origin. To support this, brands should maintain consistent product presentation, keep hero products on shelves as Timberland did with its original boots, record investment in the product, track marketing campaigns and sales, and sustain market visibility over time. This is especially relevant for visually-driven categories such as footwear, bags, accessories, and other design-focused goods.
Conclusion
After nearly three decades in the Brazilian market, Timberland’s Yellow Boot has secured trademark protection based on acquired distinctiveness. The ruling indicates that long-term market use and consistent consumer perception can establish design features as indicators of commercial origin.
It also shows that protection for non-traditional marks is evaluated on a country-by-country basis, requiring brands to pursue registration and enforcement separately in each market. Legal outcomes will differ internationally, so brands should leverage the full range of intellectual property rights to protect and maintain the distinctiveness of their designs.
Sources:
Timberland’s yellow boot secures trademark protection in Brazil