Browse All Content

  • Kokito I Punt vs.  The French Football Federation: General Court Rules on Trademark Dispute

    Kokito I Punt vs.  The French Football Federation: General Court Rules on Trademark Dispute

    On January 15, 2025, the Third Chamber of the General Court delivered a pivotal ruling in the trademark dispute between Kokito I Punt, SL and the Fédération Française de Football (FFF). The case revolves around a trademark application featuring a stylized rooster submitted by Kokito I Punt, SL. The FFF raised objections, claiming the rooster

    Read more…


  • Adidas vs Fashion Nova: The Fight Over Stripes Returns to Court

    Adidas vs Fashion Nova: The Fight Over Stripes Returns to Court

    Adidas vs Fashion Nova has resurfaced as Adidas files a new lawsuit alleging that Fashion Nova violated the terms of a 2022 settlement agreement concerning its Three Stripe trademark. The complaint, filed on March 4, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, includes claims of trademark infringement, breach of contract,

    Read more…


  • Hermès’ “H” in Question: The Legal Standard for Genuine Use

    Hermès’ “H” in Question: The Legal Standard for Genuine Use

    Hermès International, known for its luxury goods, sought to protect its figurative trademark through an International Registration designating the EU. This trademark covers a range of items in Class 25, including clothing, footwear, and accessories. The application was made on September 8, 2016, but the situation turned into a legal tug-of-war when Markus Bennemann filed

    Read more…


  • Beverly Hills Polo Club vs. Amazon: Court Orders Nearly $39M in Damages

    Beverly Hills Polo Club vs. Amazon: Court Orders Nearly $39M in Damages

    The High Court of Delhi has ruled in Lifestyle Equities CV & Anr. vs Amazon Technologies, Inc., exposing how e-commerce giants leverage marketplace dominance at the expense of brand owners. Amazon was found to have used a logo infringing upon the Beverly Hills Polo Club (BHPC) trademark, leading to a permanent injunction and substantial damages.

    Read more…


  • Louis Vuitton v. Warner Bros.: Trademark Protection vs. Creative Expression

    Louis Vuitton v. Warner Bros.: Trademark Protection vs. Creative Expression

    On December 22, 2011, Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. filed a lawsuit against Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. following the release of The Hangover: Part II. The dispute centered around the use of a travel bag in the film, which Louis Vuitton argued was a counterfeit version of its signature Toile Monogram design. The bag, produced by

    Read more…


  • Birkenstock’s sandal designs failed to qualify for copyright

    Birkenstock’s sandal designs failed to qualify for copyright

    A design may be instantly recognisable, commercially successful, and deeply associated with a brand, but that does not mean it qualifies for copyright protection. The German Federal Court of Justice has ruled that Birkenstock’s Madrid and Arizona sandal designs do not qualify for copyright protection. The decision confirms that these widely recognised footwear models lack

    Read more…


  • Logo Dispute: Christian Dior and Twinset S.p.A. Go Head-to-Head Over Trademark Rights

    Logo Dispute: Christian Dior and Twinset S.p.A. Go Head-to-Head Over Trademark Rights

    A recent trademark dispute has highlighted the complexities of branding in the fashion industry, focusing on the competition between two notable brands: Twinset S.p.A. and Christian Dior Couture. The case originated in April 2022 when Twinset sought to register a new figurative trademark covering a variety of products, in the European Union. The Opposition Shortly

    Read more…


  • Delhi High Court Grants House of Masaba an Injunction Against “Masaba Couture” Copycats

    Delhi High Court Grants House of Masaba an Injunction Against “Masaba Couture” Copycats

    The Delhi High Court has granted House of Masaba Lifestyle. an interim injunction against Masabacoutureofficial.co & others for unauthorised use of the MASABA trademark. The order not only restrains the defendants from using the brand name but also directs Instagram to remove infringing pages and disclose the defendants’ details. House of Masaba and Its Trademark

    Read more…


  • The New York Fashion Workers Act 2025: A Stitch in Time for Labor Rights

    The New York Fashion Workers Act 2025: A Stitch in Time for Labor Rights

    For years, New York’s fashion industry has been a double-edged sword: glamorous on the surface but frayed at the seams when it comes to worker treatment. The industry has faced criticism for low wages, grueling hours, and workplace conditions that could make anyone feel like they were caught in a fashion faux pas. The COVID-19

    Read more…


  • BurberryBeauty.com Case: A Timeless Lesson in Brand Protection

    BurberryBeauty.com Case: A Timeless Lesson in Brand Protection

    Burberry, renowned for its iconic trench coats and signature check pattern, successfully reclaimed the domain burberrybeauty.com through a UDRP proceeding. This outcome at the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Centre shows Burberry’s commitment to safeguarding its trademark and maintaining its brand identity in the digital space. This case shows Burberry’s strategy of protecting its trademark rights

    Read more…


  • Charlotte Tilbury vs Aldi: Copyright Dispute Over Beauty Palette

    Charlotte Tilbury vs Aldi: Copyright Dispute Over Beauty Palette

    Charlotte Tilbury, known for its luxury makeup and skincare, has secured a decisive legal victory in the Charlotte Tilbury vs Aldi case. The brand, recognised for its premium products and distinctive aesthetic, brought proceedings against Aldi for copyright infringement. The dispute centred on Aldi’s imitation of Charlotte Tilbury’s iconic Filmstar Bronze and Glow palette. The

    Read more…


  • Jacquemus Defends Its Identity: Stopping Domain Misuse

    Jacquemus Defends Its Identity: Stopping Domain Misuse

    Jacquemus built its name in fashion, not for others to misuse. When unauthorised domains surfaced, attempting to exploit its brand name, Jacquemus took the fight to WIPO. The cases exposed clear bad faith registrations, with respondents either misleading consumers or sitting on domains for profit. The rulings in favour of Jacquemus made one thing clear:

    Read more…


  • Dunhill Prevails in Trademark Dispute Against Danhuoli in China

    Dunhill Prevails in Trademark Dispute Against Danhuoli in China

    Dunhill has secured a decisive ruling in China against Danhuoli, a company found guilty of trademark infringement and unfair competition. The Foshan Intermediate People’s Court ordered Danhuoli to pay RMB 10 million (approximately $1.47 million USD) in damages. The ruling is a strong signal that China’s intellectual property enforcement is tightening, particularly for foreign luxury

    Read more…


  • Ferragamo vs. Counterfeits: How Ferragamo Fights Back Against Fraud

    Ferragamo vs. Counterfeits: How Ferragamo Fights Back Against Fraud

    In the world of luxury fashion, counterfeit goods are not just a nuisance; they pose a significant threat to brand integrity and consumer trust. For Salvatore Ferragamo, a brand synonymous with Italian craftsmanship and luxury, combating counterfeiters is an ongoing challenge. As counterfeit products flood the market, Ferragamo’s legal strategy reflects its firm stance on

    Read more…